Would you vote for Roger Clemens, if you were member of BWAA?

Fans of baseball and many other persons seem to be indignant by results of voting for the Hall of Fame. Some brilliant players have not been elected for the Baseball Hall of Fame. It is not surprisingly that you also ask why they have not been elected. Under rules of voting, those that have demonstrated brilliant baseball skills and contributed to their teams evidentially should be elected. Undoubtedly, such baseball players, as Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and several other sportsmen have manifested amazing abilities and achievements while playing professionally. Why aren’t they elected for the Baseball Hall of Fame?
Many voters say that they will never support those that have ever been related to anabolic steroids and/or other related drugs. Dopers must get penalty. Future generations should realize that they will never actually succeed, if they apply doping products.
What would you do, if you were a voter? Would you support consumers of steroids?
Actually, voters never possess complete information about admitted and suspected steroid users. You can’t prove that Roger Clemens has really doped. A lot of persons have suspicions but there is no any steroid evidence. How may voters refuse to support him? Are they sure that he has administered anabolic steroids and other prohibited drugs? –No, they aren’t. That’s why it is wrong to keep Roger Clemens out of the Baseball Hall of Fame just because of suspicions.
While some voters are ready to support suspected steroid users, they state that they will never vote for an admitted steroid user. Although it seems to be right, let analyze the situation better! Have anabolic steroids played any essential role in success of certain baseball player? For example, if even Roger Clemens has applied performance-enhancing drugs, it is possible to convince anyone that he has succeeded not because of steroids. Extraordinary accomplishment of this famous baseball player have been demonstrated before his alleged steroid use. According to several affirmations, Roger Clemens has taken steroids since 1998 and then in 2000 and 2001.  But the most amazing accomplishments have been done by him before 1998. So, no one can claim that steroids have helped Roger Clemens to have such great success. That’s why he should be in the Hall of Fame.
Furthermore, why are numerous persons inclined to blame just dopers? Isn’t it the society that presses sportspeople to start using steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs?