California lawmakers initiated request to Congress

Lawmakers of California confirm that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspeople suspected of steroid use. So, athletes that have never tested positive for any forbidden medications are targeted. That’s why the legislators presented a request to Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored mainly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars every year. This governmental office promotes fighting against application of banned medicines. Its goal is to eradicate illegal manufacture and drug use, crimes related to application of illegal medications, etc.
The request of California lawmakers was initiated soon after the cyclist Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime ban from professional sports.
Everyone knows that the former cyclist Lance Armstrong has lost his 7 titles obtained at Tour de France. He was also banned from competitions entirely.
In June Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, claiming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks refused to accept the lawsuit. He said that the USADA acted properly. Sam Sparks also said that the USADA was formed in order to clean sports from athletes who apply prohibited preparations.
California Senator Michael Rubio confirmed that Sam Sparks didn’t do correctly, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. So, the senators claimed that the USADA violated rights of certain sportspersons. That’s why they asked the Congress to review the issue.

Barry Bonds supports 7-time Tour de France winner

Barry Bonds knows what a sportsperson experiences, when he/she is pursued by the government and anti-doping officials. He understands what this person feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspeople accused of doping. So, Barry Bonds supports the former American cyclist Lance Armstrong.
During an interview a reporter asked Barry Bonds about problems of Lance Armstrong linked with doping accusations. The former baseball player expressed his admiration towards the cyclist. He claimed that Lance Armstrong was the most brilliant cyclist that has ever been in professional cycling.
Undoubtedly, Barry Bonds knows what he says. He realizes what it means to be a good cyclist. After this sportsperson retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He participated in some competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, he sees that this sport has the same problems like baseball. He comprehends that cyclists are pursued by the government and anti-doping agencies like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were investigated by feds and anti-doping officials.
Federal prosecutors accused Barry Bonds of lying about usage of banned preparations and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the sportsperson lied about usage of prohibited drugs. But they found him guilty of obstructing justice. The former baseball player decided to appeal the decision of the court.
As for Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to prosecute the cyclist. The USADA claimed that Lance Armstrong had been administering banned preparations throughout his cycling career. The athlete decided to discontinue fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He lost his Tour de France titles and money he had won at these events.
However Lance Armstrong lost his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They confirm that he is the most wonderful cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors continue to support his cancer charity. The seven-time Tour de France winner helps people to fight against cancer. Thus, many persons are thankful. They will always remember what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been destructed by accusations related to application of forbidden substances. The former baseball player thinks that his achievements during the baseball career are more essential than the suspicions. He believes that people will forget about the suspicions and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Why is Belarusian medalist sentenced to one-year ban?

The Belarusian shot putter Nadezya Ostapchuk won the gold medal at the 2012 Summer Olympics. But she failed a drug test. As a result, she was stripped of the medal that was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests displayed that a steroid’s metabolites presented in her urine samples.
If an athlete is caught taking any prohibited drugs, he/she is commonly sentenced to a ban of two years. When it comes to Nadezya Ostapchuk, she received one-year suspension. Why was the sentence lighter? There were several circumstances which proved the following aspect: Nadezya Ostapchuk didn’t administer any prohibited medication intentionally.
At the beginning the shot putter blamed his former coach. She confirmed that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency investigated this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also took part in the investigation. It was defined that Yefimov was guilty. This person put powder of methenolone into food of the shot putter during the last week before the 2012 London Olympics. The coach claimed that he had worried about Nadezya Ostapchuk. He thought that this steroid would help to win.
In fact, it is difficult to understand why Yefimov has done it. He only caused the problem.
Anti-doping agencies accepted these statements. That’s why the Belarusian shot putter received just one-year ban.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that the Belarusian shot putter had not taken the steroid intentionally. They confirmed that Yefimov just tried to protect the shot putter. They claimed that the Belarusian shot putter had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If Nadezya Ostapchuk’s performance was great several months before the 2012 London Olympics, her trainer had to be sure that she would win. Why did he worry about her performance?

Testicles and erections of athletes accused of doping

Several athletes that are suspected of steroid use become targets of the government. Federal prosecutors do almost everything in order to define whether some sportspersons have administered any doping products. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this goal. Much money is wasted to reveal even private life of athletes. According to the government, some details of their private behavior can disclose the truth about administration of forbidden preparations. So, girlfriends of certain sportspersons are interviewed by federal prosecutors.
For example, it has been disclosed that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about some aspects related to private life of these athletes. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about size of testicles of this athlete. She reported that the baseball player’s testicles were shrunken. Thus, her answer served as an argument that Barry Bonds administered steroids and/or other prohibited medications.
It is known that testicular atrophy belongs to negative consequences of several steroids. Thus, the government decided to find out whether Barry Bonds had had this problem. But it is an unreliable argument in order to prove that anyone has used certain prohibited substances. Steroid users can prevent this negative result, if they take certain medications for this need.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former baseball player had had erectile dysfunctions. The woman affirmed that sometimes Roger Clemens had suffered from this problem.
As for erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during administration of steroids. But if you study information about unwanted reactions of steroids more attentively, you can comprehend that this problem is more likely to appear after discontinuation of intake. It happens because natural secretion of testosterone is usually suppressed by usage of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such products which can restore natural secretion of testosterone, erectile dysfunctions can be prevented.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also targeted by the government. But questions are not disclosed. According to several suppositions, she might have been asked also about sexual abilities of the cyclist.
In fact, federal prosecutors have a mistaken opinion in this case. Although shrinkage of testicles and erectile dysfunctions may appear because of steroids, these arguments are not suitable.

Don Hooton: steroids are related to several side effects

Some preparations are called “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these preparations represent? Why have been they named “performance-enhancing”? Various persons may present different definitions. Let present what a teenager believes! Before presenting her point of view it is necessary to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, had serious depression after usage of steroids. Finally, he committed suicide. He desired to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other celebrated athletes who have applied steroids. But his life ended suddenly. His sister notes that performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous preparations. They are named “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young individuals who want to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, formed a foundation to teach youth about risks connected with steroids. He describes which dangers are associated with application of anabolic steroids and other related preparations. He also utilizes slideshow presentations in order to explain that these preparations may cause such unwanted consequences, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver dysfunctions, etc.
Don Hooton tries to educate young people about dangerous risks linked with intake of steroids. But he admits that it is difficult. He confirms that a lot of young persons apply doping products. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they want to be like them. They follow their examples in order to improve appearance and have more endurance.
Unfortunately, several parents think that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them think that their daughters don’t take steroids because these products are indicated to get muscles and body weight in general. But according to numerous sources, girls also take steroids. They use these drugs in order to lose fat. Some parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also used to lower fat deposits. That’s why grown-ups also should be educated about effects of steroids. Moreover, certain parents think that their children don’t use steroids because these drugs are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to get steroids for a cycle.
It is affirmed that each16th high school student applies steroids. But this opinion is mistaken. Each 16th high school student admits to applying doping products.   But the most of young individuals hide that they administer these products.
Those who listen to Don Hooton’s presentations about steroids express their thanks. They are happy that they get knowledge about these products.

Hypocrites continue war on steroids

Anyone knows that anabolic steroids are often demonized. If an athlete or a bodybuilder uses steroids and/or other doping products, he/she is claimed to be a cheater. Journalists report about such individuals as about those who have destructed their reputation. Anti-doping officers put great efforts and spend money in other to catch athletes that dope. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that several athletes have applied steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. It is stated that those who dope take unfair advantages during competitions.
Many articles describe the fight against steroids. But let see whether arguments against usage of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to take them.
It is confirmed that steroid-using sportspersons serve as a bad example for children and young persons. It is known that youth sees a lot of sports stars that take steroids and other related medications. As a result, young individuals desire to look and be as strong, as these celebrated sports figures.  Furthermore, it is widely disputed about health dangers related to steroids. But if you are attentive, you can see that these arguments are weak because hypocrisy reigns here.
Let examine the most spread arguments against intake of anabolic steroids and/or other related preparations.
According to the first argument, application of steroids is closely associated with several potential health risks. Many articles warn about shrunken testicles and enlarged heart which may occur on account of steroid use. Although it may be true, let analyze our life. We eat unhealthy food, although we know that it destroys our health. Several persons administer antidepressants that are also very unsafe. We do also other unhealthy things.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using sportspersons have unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they enhance performance with these medications. Let see what happens in other areas, for example, in the world of entertainment.  Many actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play certain roles in movies. They also have unfair advantages over others with the help of several surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to suspensions.
While it is affirmed that steroid-using sportspersons send bad messages to young persons who want to look like them and follow their examples, no one notes about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also desire to look like those they see in magazines.
While feds pursue sportspeople who apply steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses who act the same way.
It is clear that arguments against usage of steroids are quite weak. They manifest hypocrisy which reigns in our counterfeit world.

It is strange that Nadzeya Ostapchuk has tested positive for steroid metenolone

Nadzeya Ostapchuk, a shot putter from Belorussia won the 2012 Olympic gold medal. But she lost the medal because she was caught using the anabolic steroid metenolone (methenolone). She provided two samples. The substance metenolone presented in both urine samples.
If you read steroid scandals, you must know that competitive sportspeople and bodybuilders are usually caught taking other steroids and/or doping products. But as for Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she tested positive for metenolone. It is strange, according to statements of anti-doping officers. What does this prohibited product represent? Why don’t sportspersons ordinarily administer this drug for increase of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It has slight androgenic features. It works like testosterone, increasing muscle mass and adding strength.
Although this drug possesses only mild androgenic nature, it causes development of sex male characteristics in women. Females that apply this remedy may face usual effects of masculinization: the voice deepens; excessive hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This medication may be applied orally or through injections.
Metenolone (Methenolone) causes amazing effects, when it is taken by athletes during their trainings. It is not administered during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is used only on the day of a competition.
It is also confirmed that it is easy to detect those that apply this anabolic steroid.
Negative consequences of Metenolone (Methenolone) hinge on measures that are applied. They include water retention, hypercalcaemia, bone growth, hirsutism, acne, hair loss, troubles linked with menstrual cycles, increased libido, etc.
Thus, when you see a female athlete that has deep voice and excessive hair growth on the body, you may suspect her of doping. In fact, it is wrong because these troubles may appear also in those women that don’t take any steroids. But sometimes these effects display that certain female athletes administer preparations which have androgenic nature.

Australian physician prescribed steroids to patients that were competing

Some physician abuse their position, prescribing medications that don’t correspond to medical needs of patients. Why does it happen? It is known that some medications are claimed to be prescription drugs. It means that you can’t get them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such preparations. It is illegal to purchase steroids without a prescription in some countries. Those that do it may be punished. They may be sentenced to imprisonment and/or fines. Of course, numerous individuals are looking for methods to get and take these medications without having legal troubles.
Anabolic steroids are widely abused. A lot of athletes and bodybuilders administer these drugs not for medical purposes but for increase of performance. If they live in countries where these drugs can’t be purchased legally without prescriptions, they find several ways to mask their illegal purchase and intake. Sportspersons, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their health care providers to prescribe them these medicines, as if they had clinical needs to use them. Thus, certain physicians induce selling anabolic steroids to those who abuse them. Here is a case.
Peter Grant, an Australian physician, recommended steroids to 14 patients during nine years. Medical state of these persons didn’t require intake of these medicines. Thus, the doctor was accused of inappropriate practicing medicine. For example, he recommended to a patient applying such products, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to prescribe these drugs to this individual. Moreover, these drugs were recommended him during 9 years.
The physician Peter Grant acknowledged that some patients were competing. Thus, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to reading scientific information about anabolic steroids. He claimed that he knew how steroids acted. Thus, he supervised the patients that administered anabolic steroids.
Taking these aspects in consideration, it is possible to affirm that the physician Peter Grant was better known by those that administered steroids for increase of performance than by those that had to be cured from certain health troubles. Peter Grant claimed that he knew that steroids were purchased by his patients only for personal use.
When the physician appeared in the court, the judge claimed that the doctor promoted selling steroids. The judge confirmed that Peter Grant had to be punished appropriately. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for a year. Furthermore, the judge stated that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Sheryl Crow was implicated in steroid scandal linked with Lance Armstrong

The cyclist Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the athlete had administered EPO and other banned preparations.
Many persons provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation related to Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the cyclist was also targeted. She was scheduled to appear in the court. Certain sports journalists noted that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by federal prosecutors.
Lance Armstrong and Sheryl Crow were claimed to be one of the most celebrated couples. They spent much time together. The musician lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. She travelled with the cyclist during his workouts. They were in a close relationship, when Lance Armstrong won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton noted that Lance Armstrong had used forbidden medicines. They also confirmed that the athlete had been the leader of a doping group. In addition to these affirmations, they noted that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment utilized for usage of banned preparations. These individuals were going to testify against the 7-time winner of tour de France. They confirmed that the cyclist had won Tour de France 7 times because of banned medications.
As for the musician Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the cyclist was dropped prior to the hearing.
While federal prosecutors dropped the case, the USADA continued to pursue the former cyclist. As a result, Lance Armstrong forfeited his titles. He was also banned from sports for the whole life. Luckily, his charity against cancer was not destroyed. Sponsors continue to support Lance Armstrong and donate. However his titles are stripped, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps numerous persons that fight against cancer.

Which basis does Skip Bayless have to accuse Derek Jeter of doping?

Skip Bayless, a journalist of the channel ESPN2, accuses Derek Jeter, a baseball player, of steroid use. He has pronounced his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
Actually, Skip Bayless doesn’t have any basis in order to suggest that Derek Jeter applies banned preparations. Despites this fact, the affirmations of Skip Bayless have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of doping, the sports journalist started to criticize anti-doping system of the MLB. He noticed that the MLB’s tests for banned preparations are not advanced enough to catch those that use forbidden preparations.
The ESPN2 journalist Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s opinion linked with testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test which is used in the MLB. This method is not sophisticated enough to catch those who use banned preparations. Instead of this method, it is necessary to use another. Carbon isotope ratio is more proper.
The journalist Skip Bayless also claimed that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this drug is performed in the MLB just once per year. But blood tests for this medicine should be performed more times during year. Otherwise, players may take this drug and remain undetectable.
Thus, the sports journalist thinks that Derek Jeter administers HGH and other performance-enhancing drugs. The sports journalist also noticed that if he were a baseball player, he would apply HGH.
Thus, Skip Bayless supposes that MLB players administer HGH and probably other forbidden products without being detected by anti-doping officers.
It goes without saying that the steroid era in baseball has not ended. Professional baseball players take different prohibited drugs and remain undetectable. But no one can accuse an athlete of steroid use, basing just on improper drug testing. It is important to focus on facts, accusing a person of usage of forbidden drugs. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

MLB player created fake web site to escape from suspension

It happens frequently that when sportspeople test positive for any banned products, they try to prove that they have never applied any banned medication intentionally. They find different ways to demonstrate that they are not guilty. They do a lot in order to escape from bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a case.
The professional baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for testosterone. Undoubtedly, he was sentenced to a ban. Like other athletes he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and avoid the suspension.
Numerous doping sportspersons who are caught say that they have applied a dietary supplement which resulted in positive for certain forbidden substance. However certain athletes may have administered fake dietary supplements, numerous athletes take steroids and choose this way of defense because it works in many cases.
So, Melky Cabrera confirmed that he had applied a dietary supplement which led to his positive for testosterone. In fact, it was a hoax. Trying to avoid the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious supplement and advertisements which promoted selling it. The supplement didn’t exist in reality. It was just a hoax of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the professional baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), was the person that created the site.
But the lie turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose the baseball player and Juan Nunez. So, the baseball player was enforced to serve the ban.
The ACES had also problems. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were suspected of involving in the hoax. But these individuals confirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the web site and the hoax that was thought out by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had not been implicated in this defense.
The case is still investigated by the Food and Drug Administration. It is unclear yet whether other individuals would be also pursued and punished for the hoax.

Why do prostitutes apply corticosteroids?

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection detained four individuals who had the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam intended to smuggle these drugs to Bangladesh. The medicines were confiscated and these individuals were detained.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper reported about this situation, affirming that 4 persons were arrested while they tried to smuggle steroids that were intended for application by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This report surprised numerous individuals. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper mean? Do prostitutes apply the same products like athletes and bodybuilder who try to improve their performance, increasing muscle mass and stamina? Why do prostitutes administer anabolic steroids? Which is the purpose?
Certain persons realized that it was wrong to suppose that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Of course, prostitutes don’t use anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes use corticosteroids that differ from anabolic steroids entirely. Corticosteroids lead to other effects. They have capacity to enhance performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids add muscle size and reduce fat deposits, corticosteroids induce wasting muscles and increase body fat deposits.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids administered by prostitutes. Those who take this preparation look healthier and more attractive. So, such prostitutes that apply this medicine have more clients.
A prostitute that uses Orexadon affirms that she is capable serve up to 15 clients a day.
So, it is possible to claim that prostitutes don’t administer anabolic steroids which are usually advised for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more suitable remedies for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper published a false piece of news. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Usage of Clomid for recovery after steroid cycles

When you get steroids for cycles, you should also prepare such remedies that must be used to get recovery after administration of steroids.
In case a steroid cycle lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG should be used during the cycle. It is important to take in consideration that this remedy is administered just during steroid use.
There such products that must be administered after steroid cycles. For example, Clomid should be taken after steroid use. It is needed to start applying this drug after androgen levels fall significantly and recovery with this remedy becomes possible. It is usually advised to start applying Clomid with an enhanced dosage (300 mg/day) and decrease it gradually till 50 mg daily. Then low measures are taken until steroid users are sure that natural production of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their normal size.
If Clomid is taken circa 6 weeks and no improvement is seen, it is needed to interrupt usage of this drug. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is recommended to continue administering Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is permitted to administer this product a year. Certain studies have demonstrated that long-term administration of this remeduy doesn’t lead to grave problems. However several individuals may experience vision problems because of Clomid, these troubles are not irreversible. They disappear after discontinuation of intake. If any negative effects related to vision system appear in those that apply Clomid, they must stop taking this preparation.
Clomid may be also used after steroid cycles. A normal dose is 75 mg daily in such situations.
However there are such products which help to get recovery after steroid cycles and maintain strength and muscle gains, it is not recommended to have prolonged steroid cycles.

Properties of Clomid and Nolvadex

Numerous people frequently ask which medication is more proper for a PCT: Clomid or Nolvadex. While several steroid users think that Clomid is better for this need, others think that Nolvadex is more proper. Some persons believe that Clomid and Nolvadex should be stacked.
When you examine structures of these medicines, you can see that they have similar structures. That’s why they have some similar features. But the most of individuals and even scientists claim that Clomid and Nolvadex are entirely different products. Which basis does this affirmation have? These drugs are used in medicine for different needs. Nolvadex is indicated for treatment of breast cancer in females. When it comes to Clomid, it is administered in case of infertility. That’s why it is believed that these are totally various medicines.
Actually, they may be also administered for various purposes in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is advised in order to receive recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. When it comes to Nolvadex, it is ordinarily used as an anti-estrogen remedy.
Comparing potency of these medicines, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more powerful anti-estrogen substance than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex have capacity to lower estrogen levels, stimulating hypothalamus to secrete greater quantities of testosterone.
As for doses of these medications, they are different because one of them is more powerful than another. Clomid should be used in more increased measures. Thus, such quantities of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, lead to more obvious benefits than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most potent anti-estrogen. Such medicines, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are considered to be more powerful but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be administered together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such combinations are ordinarily administered in case of abnormal development of breast tissues.
When you want to choose which drug you should administer: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account some aspects.
Nolvadex has positive impact on cholesterol levels. It also has more direct influence on natural secretion of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already noted, Nolvadex is more potent than Clomid. In addition to these positive features, Nolvadex is safer. Moreover, Nolvadex leads to less dangerous unwanted results than Clomid because more decreased measures are needed to cause good results. Furthermore, while adverse effects of Clomid are irreversible, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of administration. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to keep more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, steroid users can make their choice properly.